OCT 18, 2021 8 MIN READ
“Yes, and…”
In
the spirit of continuous improvement, I feel the need to improve on my first
proposed vaccine mandate response letter.
I realized after I posted the "No Thank You" letter that, while
persuasive, it did not follow my own negotiation strategy which aligns with the
improv comedy formula of always seeking to say "yes, and..." and
avoid saying "no" if at all possible.
Further, in the intro to the first vax
letter I neglected to inform readers that they could use, alter, and edit the
letter however they saw fit and that I assert no copyright and expect no
compensation for its use. So please use that letter and this one all you
want and edit them however you want.
Below is Vax Letter 2.0. It is at
the same time agreeable and also much more pointed about the outrageous risk
that employers are attempting to foist upon their employees. Although
more agreeable, because it exposes the raw risk reality of what is going on, no
employer will ever agree to it. The primary purpose of Vax Letter 2.0 is
to awaken, persuade, and move the public consciousness in a better and
healthier direction. If it also saves your job, so much the better.
Use at your own risk.
Dear _______:
Thank you for your request that I be
vaccinated. My answer to your request is "yes," I agree to be
vaccinated. I will schedule the vaccination once you have
responded to questions and agreed to the conditions below.
It is my hope and expectation that we
will work together on these issues. I love my job and I am good at it.
I appreciate your help in the process. I need the income to
support my family. And I'm sure that you would like to avoid the very
high cost of replacing me--approximately 50 percent of my
annual salary. It appears that it is in our
mutual interests to work together to retain me as your employee.
Again, I am saying "yes" in
response to your request that I get vaccinated. At the same time I will
need answers and/or some agreement on these issues before I schedule the
appointment.
Authority.
This may sound strange, but as an intial matter I need to know the source
of the authority for your request. I understand that you are implementing
this mandate because of an Executive Order from the President of the United
States requiring that employers with 100 or more employees mandate
vaccinations. I have searched for this Executive Order and have not been
able to find it. Also, there are no OSHA rules. Federal rule-making
is an administrative process takes time and is subject to public input and
debate before finalization. That has not even started. So, if you
can, please forward your authority to me. If you can't find any legal
authority for your demand, I respectfully request that we end this conversation
and get back to work.
Risk. As you may or
may not be aware, all of the sellers of the vaccine that you require are
completely immune from legal liability for any adverse health outcomes caused
by the vaccine. In addition, because the vaccine has been fast-tracked
under an "Emergency Use Authorization," it is not clear to me that it
has been properly tested and proven to be safe. There is much anecdotal
evidence of severe adverse outcomes--including Guillain-Barre Syndrome
(paralysis) and Myocarditis to name only two. Many esteemed health
professionals claim that m-RNA vaccines create increased health risk because
they cause future uncontrolled immune response ("cytokine storms")
when the vaccinated come in contact with future viruses. These smart
health professionals liken the m-RNA vaccination to a ticking time bomb that
explodes the immune system when the body is later subjected to new viruses.
I don't know if this is true. I do know that whether or not this is
true likely won't be known for years.
The known risk of contracting
"Covid-19" is the infection to fatality rate (IFR). All
available data indicates that the IFR for "Covid-19" is no different
than all past prior seasonal flus. The Covid-19 IFR does not, therefore,
support the narrative that it is an extraordinarily dangerous pandemic.
Further, credible evidence suggests that
natural immunity (immunity created by my body should I contract
"Covid-19") is around 17x more efffective than the vaccination you
are demanding as a condition of my employment.
Of course I could be wrong, but based on
the knowable facts, it appears to me that the health risk associated with
contracting "Covid-19" are lower than those associated with receving
a vaccination. And, as I said, I am still willing to receive the
vaccination as you request. That is, I am willing to risk my life to
retain my job. What I will require from you in return is that you, as my
employer and the party that is requiring me to receive the vaccine, share in
the risk. If I lose my life or my health because I have agreed to your
request, I need you to assure me that you will compensate me (or my family if
the vaccine kills me). This is necessary because the vaccine sellers
themselves will not accept any risk associated with my taking the vaccine.
Dispute resolution terms.
Because credible evidence suggests that the vaccines can cause autoimmune
damage or failure and because autoimmune problems manifest in many different
and nebulous ways, together we will also need to come to some sort of agreement
on who bears the burden of proof regarding your obligation to pay me if I die
or if I am afflicted by an autoimmune disease. I would propose that, if I
die before my actuarily-determined time, the burden of proof will be on you to
prove that my death was not caused by the vaccine. Similarly, if in the
next 10 years I acquire an autoimmune disease or other vaccine-related ailment,
you will bear the burden of proving that the cause of my ailment was something
other than the experimental vaccine that you have demanded. This is fair
because I have agreed to risk my life for the company by acquiesing to your
demand that I accept an experimental medical treatment and unapproved drug
while the drug's seller refuses to accept any liablity. I should not bear
all of the risk when the risk calculus is so unclear and probably weighted in
favor of no vaccination. Since you are demanding that I receive the
vaccine as a condition of my employment, you should bear the financial risk if
this turns out to be a big mistake. I am willing to put skin in the game
and risk my life and health. You, as my employer, need to have financial
skin in the game if this turns out to be a bad idea. If we both have some
risk, then we can expect that together we will make a better decision.
Because I am concerned that the United
States legal system may be biased in favor of large corporations and
pharmaceutical companies, I will also need some assurance that you will not
renege on our agreement and take advantage of any systemic bias to avoid your
obligation. I propose to you agree to pay liquidated damages of $5
million if you: (1) do anything to prevent my case from being tried in
front of jury--this includes motions to dismiss, motions for summary judgment,
etc.; (2) do anything to seek to deny or alter the burden of proof that we have
stipulated to above; or (3) do anything to exclude any evidence, including this
letter, that I offer in support of the claim that the vaccine you required
caused my death or injury. Further, you will pay this liquidated damage
sum even if any judge does any of these things on his own. And no
judicial decision will be final (no res judicata and no collateral estoppel) if
I do not receive a jury trial and you do not bear the burden of proof described
above.
Please present me with facts that
indicate that Covid-19 is not a psychological operation.
Again, this may sound a little strange, but I have read Charlie Munger's
invaluable practical guide to human thinking and perception errors entitled
"The Psychology of Human Misjudgment,"
and I am concerned that the "pandemic" we all have been living
through since January 202o has a much stronger foundation in the collective
human imagination that it does in objective reality. Every human
vulnerability, every psychological ploy and trick detailed by Mr. Munger
appears to have been used since January 202o to convince the world that it is
experiencing an extraordinarily dangerous pandemic rather than a normal,
seasonal flu with very real but at the same time very negligible risk.
Mr. Munger's observations read like a playbook of what we have experienced
since January, 2020. Again, I could be wrong, but the cacophony of psychological
manipulation appears to me to be what Mr. Munger would call a "lollapalooza"
event.
Before I schedule my vaccination
appointment, therefore please provide me with some evidence that the entire
world has not been subjected to a mass Milgram experiment (complete
with a bossy little man in a white lab coat),
and has not been subjected to a mass Stanford prison experiment (with
blue state governors eagerly assuming the role of wardens). Also please
provide me with facts that show that the pressue to wear masks and to
"social distance" had a real medical purpose and was not merely the
use of social proof bias (herd
pressure to conform). I will need some persuasive facts that indicate
that Covid-19 presents an extraordinary risk to humanity as evidenced by a
lethal IFR that is materially and statistically worse than all past seasonal
flus. I will need facts that indicate that Covid-19 is not in fact the
2020 seasonal flu dressed up, repackaged, and conflated by focusing error bias amplified
and magnfied by smart phones and computer screens. I will need some
real, unbiased, and relevant data that show that Covid "cases" and
"deaths" are real and have not been materially influenced by
financial incentive bias (rewarding doctors and hospitals for connecting and
overbroadly attributing deaths to "covid").
Finally, please provide me with
evidence: (a) that the brilliant Angelo Codevilla (recently killed in a freak
accident while walking home from church) was not prescient when he declared
that the Covid-19 narrative was actually an ongoing psychological
coup attempt; (b) that the inventor of
the PCR test, Nobel Prize winner Dr. Kary Mullis (also
the victim of an untimely death), was wrong when he said that the PCR test was
useless in identifying Covid-19 and that he believed Dr. Anthony Fauci was a
corrupt bureaucrat with no knowlege of medicine; and (c) evidence that Dr. Robert Malone (thankfully
still among the living), the inventor of m-RNA vaccines, is wrong in
recommending against m-RNA use for Covid-19.
In sum, before I schedule the
vaccination appoinment, I need your help in accepting the notion that we are
living through a very real and extraordinarily dangerous pandemic. All
the evidence I see suggests that we have experienced a perhaps artifically
enhanced seasonal flu which presents very real but very negligible risk and
that the real and negligible risk has been amplified by focusing-error bias,
smart phones, and computer screens.
Exemption Request.
I realize that you probably will not be willing or able to agree to the
conditions I have requested in this letter. I want the record to show
that I was not the one who said "no." If you will not agree to
my requests, then please consider this as my request for a vaccine exemption.
You may call it a religious exemption if you like, although I don't have
a religion. I know with certainty only a couple of things and from this
foundation I understand Reality. I know that God created me and created
you. I know that my body is the temple of His Holy Spirit. I know
that Jesus Christ was crucified and resurrected and that He has redeemed the
entire world and there is nothing you or I can do about this accomplished fact.
I know that, whether I live or die, I am God's property and that I have
trustee responsibility for my body, what I choose to do with it, and on what
terms. It is from that perspective that I have written this letter.
My exemption is based on this Reality, not religion.
If you agree to the conditions I have
set forth, then I will receive the vaccination. If you will not accept
the conditions of this letter, then please accept this as my Reality-based
exemption request under whatever legal or other exemption you feel is appropriate.
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Employee
Published by:
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario